Search this site
Embedded Files
Sofía González
  • About me
  • Mentoring
  • Training
  • Portfolio
    • Leading through change
    • Scaling Research Operations
    • Discovery Roadmap
    • Measuring experience
Sofía González
  • About me
  • Mentoring
  • Training
  • Portfolio
    • Leading through change
    • Scaling Research Operations
    • Discovery Roadmap
    • Measuring experience
  • More
    • About me
    • Mentoring
    • Training
    • Portfolio
      • Leading through change
      • Scaling Research Operations
      • Discovery Roadmap
      • Measuring experience

< Go back to Portfolio

Case study 2: Scaling Research Operations

Context & Challenge

When I joined the company, there was no ResearchOps function in place:

  • No centralized repository of insights

  • The research team did not own the participant panel

  • Few processes existed for recruitment, compliance, research training, or knowledge management

As a result, research was fragmented, difficult to scale, and decisions were often made without evidence. My challenge was to build the foundations of ResearchOps, create the role training the person who leads it, and enable research democratization across the product organization.

The eight pillars of research ops - Kate Towesy

Actions I Led

1. Participant panel ownership & infrastructure

  • Implemented UserInterviews to centralize recruitment.

  • Designed incentive models to sustain participant engagement.

2. Compliance & governance

  • Established GDPR-compliant consent and secure data storage processes.

  • Set clear guardrails for privacy, ethics, and research approvals.

3. Knowledge management

  • Created a central research repository to store, tag, and share insights.

  • Ensured insights were reusable across teams, reducing duplication.


4. Democratization enablement

  • Trained designers, PMs, and POs in research techniques (usability testing, interviews, surveys).

  • Delivered playbooks, templates, and workshops to standardize practice.

5. Culture of “the doubt”

  • Introduced workshops where teams shared hypotheses and research questions to prioritize the Product Discovery roadmap together.

  • Embedded a culture of inquiry, making research a shared capability.

What Changed? Results & Impact

  • Research became accessible: Non-researchers can now run low-risk studies confidently within our framework.

  • Time-to-insight dropped dramatically: What used to take weeks now takes days.

  • Zero duplication: Teams search the repository before starting new studies.

  • Sustainable operations: Our panel is healthy, our processes are compliant, and our tools actually get used.

  • Cultural shift: product decisions now grounded in evidence, with teams embracing structured hypotheses instead of assumptions.  The moment I knew it worked: A PM ran a usability test on their own, found a critical issue, and came to me saying, "I need help digging deeper—this is bigger than I thought." That's democratization working: empowering teams to handle the routine stuff while knowing when to escalate.

What I Learned

  • Democratization Needs Guardrails: Not every study should be "self-serve." Early on, I was too hands-off—teams ran studies they weren't equipped for, and the quality suffered. I learned that clear boundaries aren't about gatekeeping; they're about setting people up for success. Low-risk studies? Go for it. Complex methodologies or strategic discovery? Let's partner on that.

  • Infrastructure First, Then Scale: I wanted to democratize research immediately, but without the operational backbone—tools, compliance processes, a functioning repository—it would have collapsed. You can't scale chaos. Build the plumbing first, then open the floodgates.

  • Culture Change Requires Rituals, Not Just Training: Training teaches skills. Rituals change behavior. The "Culture of Doubt" workshops became a regular practice, not a one-time event. That repetition—seeing leaders admit uncertainty, watching hypotheses get tested and refined—normalized evidence-based thinking in a way that a training deck never could.

  • ResearchOps Is a Form of Care: When you remove friction for teams—confusing processes, scattered tools, unclear recruitment rules—you're not just being efficient. You're showing respect for their time and energy. You're saying "I want to make it easier for you to do great work." That's when people start leaning in.


Key Takeaways

  • Building ResearchOps from scratch isn't about buying tools—it's about creating systems that make good research easier than bad research. It's infrastructure, yes, but it's also culture, training, and trust.

  • At Travelport, we went from fragmented, reactive research to a democratized practice where insights are accessible, processes are trusted, and teams feel empowered to ask (and answer) their own questions. The research team didn't become less important—we became more strategic because we weren't drowning in logistics.

  • ResearchOps isn't the glamorous part of research. But it's the part that makes everything else possible.

< Go back to Portfolio

Case study 3: Framework for Discovery Roadmap >

© 2025 Sofía González — UX Research Leader  

🌐 www.sofiagonzalezux.com  

 Based in Barcelona, Spain 

Open to remote collaboration or travel

🔗LinkedIn | Email

Google Sites
Report abuse
Page details
Page updated
Google Sites
Report abuse